Agenda and minutes

Consultative meeting, Standards Committee - Tuesday, 12th April, 2022 10.00 am

Venue: online via zoom

Contact: Debbie Meakin  01395 517540; email:


No. Item


Public speaking

Information on public speaking is available online



There were no members of the public registered to speak.


Minutes of the previous meeting held on 10 November 2021 pdf icon PDF 165 KB

To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting held on 10 November 2021.


The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 10 November 2021 were agreed, subject to the inclusion of attendees Pat Coulter, Martin Goscomb, Robert Wood and Pauline Stott.


Declarations of interest

Guidance is available online to Councillors and co-opted members on making declarations of interest





Matters of urgency

Information on matters of urgency is available online





Confidential/exempt item(s)

To agree any items to be dealt with after the public (including the Press) have been excluded. Thereare no itemswhich officersrecommendshould be dealtwithin thisway.





Code of Conduct and related standards matters pdf icon PDF 1 MB


The Committee considered the report of the Monitoring Officer on the following issues:

·         Government response to the Committee for Standards in Public Life report

·         Personnel Committee recommendations from the 22 March 2022 meeting

·         Code of Conduct draft and consultation responses

·         Complaint procedure update

·         Appointment of a new Independent Representative and a new Town and Parish Representative.


Discussion on the report mainly centred on the recommendations from Personnel Committee, and agreeing the final elements of the Code of Conduct.


The recommendation for including an informal channel to resolve difficulties, proposed for inclusion in the Member/Officer protocol, was contested.  Any informal discussion could still be used as a means of applying pressure to a decision maker.  In response, the Monitoring Officer outlined that this was a step to be used where there was difficulty in obtaining agreement between parties, whereby the decision maker was unable or unwilling to make a decision.  Effectively the recommendation that had come forward from the Personnel Committee discussions was to advocate internal mediation to get to an outcome.  Generally sensitive or contentious decisions, which such a decision would be, would be recorded.


Other Committee members felt that it was appropriate to have an informal mechanism in place should such rare difficulties arise, to assist the decision maker in reaching a decision.


Cllr Twiss proposed, seconded by Cllr Barrow, that the reference to informal channels to resolve difficulties should be removed from the recommendation before it was put forward to Council.  This amendment did not receive support from the Committee, with the Chair using his casting vote.


Debate on the final elements of the Code reintroduced discussion on gifts and hospitality, including:

·         The consultation undertaken, although with a small number of respondents, did clearly indicate that many were against the acceptance of any gift or hospitality by a Member;

·         Some Committee members felt that a zero approach was still the right approach to take;

·         Others agreed that on a practical level, a nominal limit before declaration was required was necessary;

·         A number of scenarios and examples were shared of where impracticalities may occur;

·         Public perception was key, and educating the public would help change the perception that came across in the consultation feedback;

·         Hospitality was generally felt to be less realistic for a zero approach option;

·         The Monitoring Officer was always available for advice but would not be able to make the decision for a Member on whether to accept a gift or hospitality;

·         Some hospitality was necessary for civic duties;

·         Limit suggestions varied from zero, to £25, to £50;

·         Generally the cumulative threshold was agreed to be retained but with a limit in any calendar year;

·         Dual hatted Councillors needed to consider how the gift or hospitality was being offered and therefore which code applied; with the option to report to both authorities to be sure.


Following the debate, the Chair proposed the LGA model code threshold of £50 for gifts and hospitality, as set out in the draft Code, with a cumulative threshold of £50 in  ...  view the full minutes text for item 19.


Code of conduct complaint updates pdf icon PDF 217 KB

Additional documents:


The Committee received and noted the complaint update reports for the periods 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020; 1 January 2021 to 31 December 202; and 1 January 2022 to 31 March 2022.


The Monitoring Officer highlighted that four of the 2020 cases were still pending, but he hoped that three of these would be put before the committee to consider soon.  The new structure now in place, which included the Assessment Sub Committee, would provide a quicker process because of the timeframe installed into the complaint process.


The Chair raised a query on the value of pursuing those complaints where the subject member had since resigned which prompted discussion on the issue by the Committee.  This included:

·      No sanctions could be imposed on the subject member if they were no longer a councillor (and therefore no longer bound by the Code of Conduct); there was no duty on the subject member to continue to co-operate in any investigation that was ongoing at the time of his/her resignation/failure to be re-elected;

·      There was validity in progressing outstanding complaints where there may be recommendations to the body for which the subject member was formerly a member of; so that lessons could be learnt and to demonstrate to the complainant the outcome of the process;

·      Such complaint investigations could be put on hold for a period of time, such that if the subject member was re-elected or co-opted, the complaint would be revisited.  This was to ensure that resigning and re-standing for election/co-option was not used as a means of avoiding answering to a complaint.


Cllr Millar dispensation request pdf icon PDF 446 KB

Additional documents:


The report set out the request for a dispensation to permit Cllr Millar to participate in and vote on matters involving Exmouth Community College, in which he has a pecuniary interest.


Cllr Millar was permitted by the Chair to outline his reasons for making the request.


The Committee discussed the impact that such a dispensation would have on his role as councillor, and to what level sucha dispensation should be granted including:

·         Seeking further information from Cllr Millar on the expected job term;

·         Limit the dispensation, if agreed, to the May 2023 election and review after that if required;

·         Concerns that granting such a dispensation may set a precedent for others;

·         Each request for dispensation should be treated on a case by case basis;

·         Any granted dispensation still meant that Cllr Millar would have to declare the interest at a meeting as required;

·         Granting a dispensation to participate, but not vote, was the consensus reached as the best balance.


Recommended to Senior Officers that Cllr Paul Millar be granted a dispensation under S.33 Localism Act 2011 in relation to his employment at Exmouth Community College on the basis that it is in the interests of persons living in the authority’s area. Such dispensation to permit participation in discussion on any matter but not voting and to be of effect until the ordinary elections in May 2023.



The recommendation was approved by a Senior Officer. The Senior Officer Decision Notice is listed above under Additional Documents.